Fine Lines

One should question their government even if it crosses the lines of law. Especially if officers that are sworn to uphold these laws use it in their personal lives. Whether it be favoritism, or, simply to be endowed by fraud and or bribery.

My misdemeanor case within Merced County California, 16CR-00073, should make others question. This is not "smoke and mirrors" as Ann Hanson stated, one who I also question. Merely the fact that a Jan Hobbs owned the home she owns. Jan Hobbs, a name that's linked in within the Merced School District. All that proves is that my family and I are facing influential people who are within law, the military, and the school district. Yet, they must follow the book of law. Which brings me to another statement Hanson has made. Stating, TV shows like CSI and NCIS are fictional and have no basis in reality. Which is partially true, the plots, scripts, editing, and directing are built from the human imagination. But how the fictional characters and their fictional environments interact with one another are built from research from the real thing.

Now, look at Jeffery Horn. He served in the ARMY. Look at Jim Mcmilon, he was stationed on a USS Kitty Hawk, NAVY. Look at Joseph Opinski and his brothers, MARINES. Look at Albert Flores father, AIRFORCE. When the DA's office investigators came to our house back in April 2015. One question came out of their mouths, "are you in the military?" Whether it was in fear for feeling of doing something wrong during a breach on a mere misdemeanor or whether they would give us more respect towards us remains a mystery.

Now, it remains to be seen, but by the language above, should bring in the DOJ, FBI and the NCIS. Hell, maybe even the DOD, CIA, and the NSA. Cause, maybe Ann Hanson is right, its all smoke and mirrors. Maybe I post this information for groups such as ISIS or Al-Qaeda. Maybe, I, as an American, has lost faith in all levels of governance. Cause hey, the twin towers didn't collapse by pancakes from Ihop...Cause hey, physics.

My case is now pending appeal and the judge who sentenced me granted my motion of stay of execution. That in itself, I am grateful and hopeful. Cause PC653.2 should be re-evaluated, especially with the acceleration of technology and the tides between free speech, privacy, and the publics eye. In this day and age, an address is exposed publicly with the ease of googling ones name and city they reside in.

Excessive force supported by the military?

I begin with what has happened fairly recent. The Merced hookah lounge incident. With it's star of the hour, Joseph Opinski, served for the United States military, who, keep in mind, was cleared on multiple shootings here in Merced. Son to Greg Opinski, a construction contractor who's caught in a political scandal with former mayor Tommy Jones on bribery. 

There was far more better ways to have served the warrants. For instance, they could have avoided any conflict with the people by watching and observing in casual clothing. Later, waiting for the best time to arrests the suspects. Preferably in the best interests of the public. Yet they did it by brute force, possibly knowing it would cause conflict with outsiders.

Given Joseph's history with the Merced Police Department as well as others. Does the US military look the other way or even support the negligence of Merced county's intelligence? Especially when they served towards their interests...